meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Patrick Madrid Show

"Should I Attend that Non-Valid Catholic Wedding?" (Special Podcast Highlight)

The Patrick Madrid Show

Relevant Radio

Religion & Spirituality, Christianity

4.8588 Ratings

🗓️ 21 June 2024

⏱️ 15 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Ever been stuck wondering if you should attend a wedding of a fallen-away Catholic? There can be anger, tension, and hurt in the family if you don't go, and it's tempting to want to keep the peace! What should you do? Patrick Madrid dives into this tricky situation! Here’s some advice that can help you! 

 

Listener Letter: Maggie and Bill write in, grappling with attending a wedding of Catholics who’ve drifted from the Church and are getting married outside of it. They present objections from fellow Catholics challenging Patrick's stance against attending such weddings.

 

Patrick's Key Points:

 

Catholic Marriage Validity: A marriage involving at least one Catholic must take place in a Catholic Church before a bishop, priest, or deacon to be valid. Otherwise, it’s not recognized by the Church.

 

Natural Marriages: Marriages between non-Catholics, like Protestants or non-Christians, are considered valid by the Church. Catholics can attend these ceremonies without issues.

 

Scandal and Conscience: Attending an invalid Catholic marriage can cause scandal and gives the impression of endorsing it. This is a matter of conscience, not just a public stance.

 

St. John the Baptist Analogy: Patrick uses St. John the Baptist’s refusal to endorse Herod’s invalid marriage to show the moral duty to uphold Church teachings, even when it’s tough.

 

Objections and Patrick's Responses:

 

"John the Baptist was a political figure."

 

Response: John wasn’t a political figure; his actions had political implications. The moral duty to stand by your conscience applies to everyone, regardless of prominence.

 

"No one else cares if I attend."

 

Response: God cares. It’s about your conscience and integrity. Even if no one else knows, compromising your beliefs for convenience isn’t right.

 

"Isn't it better for them to be civilly married?"

 

Response: For Catholics, a civil marriage without following Church law is just cohabitation. The state’s recognition doesn’t make it valid in the Church's eyes.

 

"Lying during Pre-Cana is worse."

 

Response: Both lying and entering an invalid marriage are wrong. The right path is to avoid both and adhere to Church teachings.

 

"Is there a benefit to attending and showing quiet disapproval?"

 

Response: Attending might imply endorsement, causing more harm than good. Upholding your beliefs and setting an example is more beneficial.

 

Family Dynamics: Patrick totally understands how difficult it can be to take a stand for truth, but he reminds you that we always need to do God's will, even when others are against us. Ask Jesus for the courage to follow Him no matter what.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

So let me get this letter here because it just came in and I want to do it fair justice.

0:05.9

And it comes up over and over again.

0:08.6

Endlessly, people want to know, well, should I go to the wedding of a Catholic who's either

0:14.4

getting remarried or there's no annulment or they're not getting married in the Catholic

0:19.9

church?

0:24.8

Should I go? And I say, my way of looking at this is that, no, I wouldn't go. And I give my reasons. So I have a note here that came in

0:30.6

from Maggie and Bill. They're listening on the Relevant Radio app. And shout out to you guys. Thanks

0:35.2

for taking a moment to write to me. The subject is,

0:38.0

how would Patrick respond to these arguments? Your stance on attending non-valid marriages is one

0:43.8

my husband and I have come to agree with and accept. Recently, two faithful Catholics we respect

0:49.9

have raised some points against your stance. We know you won't change your mind, but we're curious

0:55.1

how you'd respond. Two baptize and confirm Catholics who no longer practice and are cohabiting

1:02.6

are getting married. They are not willing to attend pre-Cana or promise to live as Catholics

1:07.9

or raise any children as Catholics. They openly don't want any children.

1:12.3

This is my sister's daughter, and my sister does not practice either. So here are the points

1:18.8

that were raised against, so apparently as I read this email, that Maggie and Bill explained

1:25.1

to whoever the other party is, well, this is what Patrick Madrid says

1:29.9

and gave my explanation, which I'll recap in a moment. And so there are a series of five different

1:36.4

objections to my position. And so I'm just going to go through each one and offer some commentary

1:40.7

on that. So in the summary, my position is this, that the church's law

1:46.3

stipulates that in order for the marriage to be valid, and we're talking here about at least

1:51.1

one of the two parties is Catholic, and presumably, as you say, in this case, they're both Catholic.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Relevant Radio, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Relevant Radio and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.