Shooting Down the Spirit of Aloha

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Politics, Government

4.8 • 3.6K Ratings

🗓️ 12 December 2024

⏱️ 77 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This jam-packed episode features Sarah Isgur and David French dissecting the latest Supreme Court opinions, judicial retirement rumors, and the evolving era of marijuana banking. Plus: Did we push David to his limits? The Agenda: —Retirement rumors —Revoking visas and sham marriages —Parental rights in schools —The spirit of Aloha stands —Dismissing Nvidia —Marijuana banking —Corrections! Two of them! —U.S. v. Approximately Two Dogs —Motion to determine lunch spot Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Sarah’s Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Ready?
0:02.0	I was born ready.
0:04.0	Welcome to advisory opinions. I'm Sarah Asker. That's David French. This is part two for no
0:23.6	particular reason of a two-part episode. And David, in the midst of starting our two-part episode,
0:30.0	we got Supreme Court opinions both on Tuesday and Wednesday morning. Now, no, they weren't the
0:36.4	most exciting opinions in the world, but in their
0:38.9	own way, they kind of were. I mean, for starting off opinions, these were more fun than I expected.
0:46.0	What'd you think? Yeah, well, first, that we have opinions in December is kind of nice. It's kind of nice to have a couple of opinions in December.
0:56.4	So that's, we encourage that. More opinions faster, fantastic. And I would put it as, yeah,
1:05.8	better opinions than I expected for December as well. So let's start off.
1:12.6	The first one is unanimous opinion written by Justice Jackson, B.
1:17.3	Morfa v. Mayorkas.
1:18.9	On its face, this is not going to thrill anyone.
1:22.2	It is about whether someone could have their visa revoked for a sham marriage. Not their current marriage was a sham.
1:29.7	They actually have children with their spouse in this marriage, but that there were allegations
1:33.5	that their previous marriage had been a sham marriage and that he had paid $5,000 to his ex-wife
1:39.6	to marry her to get his legal, you know, status, permanent status here in the United States.
1:47.7	He then divorces her, marries new wife, they have children, they find out about the previous
1:53.4	sham marriage.
1:55.1	Interestingly, the ex-wife then recants the whole thing.
1:58.6	Look, this is rule number one, the most important decision you will make
2:03.3	in your life. It's not your career, not where you live, not whether to have children. It's who you
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.