Fasten your seatbelts. Easy jets, big orange sail is now on. With up to 20% of 700,000 seats

and 300 pounds of package holidays. But hurry, they're flying fast. Book now!

Selected travel dates, cell ends 11pm on 10th January 2023.

Demons been required and Apple protected. Travel restrictions and season sees up live.

This is CBS I'm John Batch with Professor Richard Epstein of the Hoover Institution, teaches

law at NYU and the University of Chicago. And I take advantage of the professor's generous mood

here at Year's End to comment on two Supreme Court decisions that have not been made. They

haven't even been presented in all the argument. But it's upcoming in February, February 21,

February 22. This has to do with social media, always in the news, especially with the,

you have to say, sharp reduction in price on Wall Street. This is meta, this is Facebook,

this is Twitter, this is Google. Two cases seem strikingly similar about whether the social

media sites are have immunity from lawsuits based on third party postings on their sites.

Professor, the one is called Gonzales versus Google. And the other is Twitter, Incorporated versus

Tom Neh. They strike me as extremely similar. Sorting this out is the Supreme Court ready to

make a very cleared statement that Twitter and Google and other social media sites are

exempt or are going to be held accountable. Well, I think these cases are pretty difficult.

And my inclination is not normally sympathetic to the two companies on this, is that they have

the better of the particular argument. It's important to understand what's going on here. These are not

cases in which somebody is saying that, but they did is they posted something which was defamatory

about somebody else and then failed to remove it after they've given it notice. What happens is

these are cases in which they're independent third parties, ISIS type people who go out and commit

crimes and may have and deliberate wrongs. And the question is how it is that you're going to help

...