Today, the Supreme Court ruled you have no country. They ruled yesterday also you have no country,

so it's been nice knowing you. Let me just actually get into the real details. They ruled today.

Birthright citizenship extends to people here unlawfully for any duration. This is pretty dang wild.

It's so shocking that the man of few words, Clarence Thomas, wrote, I think it's like a 41,000

word dissent saying, I got to put it simply. When you read through this, you can see that

the Supreme Court justices are not ruling on the merits. I can only conclude that something else is going on.

And I will explain this by saying that their rulings seem to be at odd with their own

opinions that don't make sense.

Notably in yesterday's ruling about mail-in votes being counted after election day,

Barrett argues that incongruous elections were leading us to

civil war or potential for a second civil war in 1872. So deadlines were sought. But oopsie,

they didn't define what a day was, therefore there is no day, ultimately concluding that ballots

can be cast an indefinite period before an election and can be cast an indefinite period before an election

and can be counted an indefinite period after an election, which of course makes no sense

because Congress codified a day for the election. By Barrett's argument, there is no language

that could be put in law that would satisfy the requirement that a ballot be received and counted

on election day. Because we quite literally already have that law. And as it pertains to birthright

citizenship, Alito and Thomas and others argued our enemies are sending people to our land

so that they can take our land from us.

And the arguments that we get from the majority are largely, well, you know, the framers of the 14th didn't have any concept of temporary visitors.

Therefore, it doesn't matter what's actually happening today at all.

I can only conclude as many others

...