SCOTUS BETRAYS AMERICA, Rules There IS NO ELECTION DAY w/ Topher Field
Timcast IRL
Timcast Media
4.5 • 7.6K Ratings
🗓️ 30 June 2026
⏱️ 123 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Tim, Ian, and Brett are joined by Topher Field to discuss SCOTUS rules with Dems to allow late mail-in ballots, California to vote on Voter ID, and a gay Jewish Democrat flees a trans march after getting surrounded by a mob.
SUPPORT THE SHOW BUY CAST BREW COFFEE NOW - https://castbrew.com/
GET OUR MERCH - https://merch.timcast.com/
Join - https://timcast.com/discord
Hosts:
Tim @Timcast (everywhere) | https://www.shoutout.fans/timpool
Ian @IanCrossland (everywhere) | https://graphene.movie/
Brett @BrettDasovic (X) | @PopCultureCrisis (everywhere)
Producer:
Carter @carterbanks (X) | @trashhouserecords (YT)
Guest:
Topher Field @TopherField (X) | https://www.topherfield.com/
Podcast available on all podcast platforms!
SCOTUS BETRAYS AMERICA, Rules There IS NO ELECTION DAY | Timcast IRL
For advertising inquiries please email sponsorships@rumble.com
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Supreme Court issued several rulings today. The most, I would say, pressing, of course, |
| 0:05.7 | is that mail-in votes, particularly absentee belts, can be counted after election day if they're |
| 0:12.3 | postmarked by election day. But the actual ruling in the opinion is that there is no deadline |
| 0:18.8 | set by Congress as to when a ballot can be cast or received. |
| 0:24.2 | Basically, the majority with the opinion written by Amy Coney-Barritt is that we don't have elections. |
| 0:29.8 | That despite the fact that Congress did codify a specific day in which you have elections, |
| 0:36.0 | Coney-Barritt says, yes, but a day of election is just the day we express our intent, |
| 0:41.2 | not when election officials determine what our intent was. |
| 0:45.9 | So basically, you could cast a vote for the president for 2028 right now. |
| 0:51.7 | And it would be a legitimate legal vote so long as the state said. And they could tell |
| 0:55.4 | you they'll count that vote a year later after the election's already over, which makes literally |
| 1:00.2 | no sense. The function of which, I wouldn't be surprised if we see this, though, you know, |
| 1:05.4 | probably not. Democrats with red seats at California, they tried to redistrict to wipe out a bunch of these Republican seats. |
| 1:13.1 | They could actually now, under this ruling, say the deadline for receipt of ballots in any capacity for the midterm election is one year after November, November of 2027. |
| 1:30.4 | They could then say, we will not conclude the election until all legal votes are counted. Now, it would be quite egregious if they did, but they could |
| 1:37.2 | pull some shenanigans and refuse to sit Republicans in Republican districts because they haven't |
| 1:43.7 | received all the ballots yet. |
| 1:45.5 | It is a ridiculous ruling. And I have to say, Amy Coney-Barrant writing for the majority, |
| 1:52.6 | wrote some of the most insane psycho babble and vile nonsense. Alito dissenting. In fact, |
| 2:00.1 | both invoke, they invoke the specter of civil war, |
| 2:05.0 | with Connie Barrett basically being like, so what, who cares? Let it all burn. I'm paraphrasing. |
| 2:10.2 | But she pointed out several instances, several arguments in which there were attempts made to create a |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in 23 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Timcast Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Timcast Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.