Sackett v. EPA (Sackett II)

5-4

Prologue Projects

News Commentary, News, Government

4.6 • 3.2K Ratings

🗓️ 27 June 2023

⏱️ 45 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

What has a head and a mouth, but cannot wear a hat? A river! What has its head up its ass, and cannot interpret the Clean Water Act correctly? The Supreme Court!

If you're not a 5-4 Premium member, you're not hearing every episode! To get exclusive Premium-only episodes, access to our Slack community, and more, join at fivefourpod.com/support.

5-4 is presented by Prologue Projects. Rachel Ward is our producer. Leon Neyfakh and Andrew Parsons provide editorial support. Our researcher is Jonathan DeBruin, and our website was designed by Peter Murphy. Our artwork is by Teddy Blanks at Chips NY, and our theme song is by Spatial Relations.

Follow the show at @fivefourpod on most platforms, and on Twitter, find Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	We'll hear an argument first this morning in case 10-10-6-2,
0:03.8	SACCET versus the Environmental Protection Agency.
0:07.0	Hey everyone, this is Leon from Fiasco and Prologg Projects.
0:14.4	On this episode of 5-4, Peter, Riannon, and Michael are talking about SACCET V EPA.
0:21.4	The ruling is from the current term and continues the court's campaign to dial back regulation.
0:27.6	Well, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of a family who's pushed to build a new house on wetlands
0:34.6	was set to violated the EPA's Clean Water Act, and the justice is ruled in the family's favor weakening the water pollution loss.
0:43.6	The court could have stopped at ruling that the building project could go forward, but instead, the conservative majority went further
0:50.6	and used the case to narrow the definition of wetlands, putting an entire swath of waterways and ecosystems at risk.
0:58.6	This is 5-4, a podcast about how much the Supreme Court sucks.
1:07.6	Welcome to 5-4, where we dissect and analyze the Supreme Court cases that have banned our civil rights, like Twitter, banning its bravest and coolest posters.
1:18.6	That's right.
1:20.6	I'm Peter, I'm here with Michael.
1:23.6	Hey everybody.
1:24.6	And Riannon.
1:25.6	Hi.
1:26.6	Old news at this point.
1:27.6	Michael was banned from Twitter.
1:29.6	Yeah.
1:30.6	But it's the first time that Michael has been back on the podcast since being banned from Twitter for making an anti-Semitic comment.
1:39.6	It's, I mean, I guess technically yes.
1:44.6	That's true.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Prologue Projects, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Prologue Projects and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.