meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Breakdown

S9, Ep. 4: A Guilty Mind?

Breakdown

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Politics, News, True Crime

4.62.7K Ratings

🗓️ 11 July 2022

⏱️ 45 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The fourth episode of “The Trump Grand Jury,” the ninth season of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s Breakdown podcast, focuses on criminal intent as part of the podcast’s continuing coverage of the Fulton County special purpose grand jury that is investigating what Donald Trump and his allies did in Georgia following the 2020 president election. If a criminal indictment is ultimately brought, prosecutors must show criminal intent – that Trump and others knew what they were doing was illegal and that they meant to break Georgia law. During a phone call with Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on Jan. 2, 2021, Trump said he needed to “find 11,780 votes.” That was exactly how many he needed to overturn the presidential election results in Georgia.   Trump also told Raffensperger “there’s nothing wrong with saying that, you know, that you’ve recalculated” the vote totals. But Raffensperger held firm, saying he believed in the official vote count, which showed Trump had lost in Georgia. This phone call is at the heart of the special purpose grand jury’s investigation and legal experts are divided on whether it shows Trump had criminal intent. And, somewhat surprisingly, it is not a matter that falls neatly along party lines – even some of Trump’s harshest critics say they don’t see a crime. Breakdown’s fourth episode also looks at the possible defenses the president could raise if an indictment is returned. No president or former president has ever been indicted. So if this happens the prosecution, the defense and the courts will be breaking new ground. “There are all kinds of hurdles the prosecution would have to overcome with prosecuting an ex-president,” Atlanta criminal defense attorney Don Samuel says on the podcast. “It wouldn’t surprise me if that ends up in the U.S. Supreme Court before it ever ends up in a courtroom.” You can download the Breakdown podcast from Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Stitcher or your favorite podcasting platform. You can also stream it on your computer from ajc.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

It's worth knowing which is really going on.

0:04.0

This is the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

0:08.0

Previously on Breakdown.

0:13.0

That woman, what could it take in those ballots now?

0:16.0

What could it have started around with the ballots?

0:18.0

Nobody in the room hiding around.

0:20.0

They look like that, they look like that, passing out dope.

0:23.0

But if we narrow down to the particulars of what I understand

0:28.0

the DA to be looking into, which is whether there's any criminal

0:33.0

or illegal conduct, I don't even think it's really close to be fair.

0:39.0

It's possible if the DA, I believe she's already indicated

0:43.0

she is looking into the allegations of fake electors,

0:47.0

it's possible that anybody involved in that particular scheme

0:51.0

could also be investigated and potentially charged

0:55.0

under this criminal solicitation felony statute.

1:00.0

We've laid out many of the state laws,

1:02.0

Fulton County District Attorney Fannie Willis could consider

1:05.0

as she decides whether to press charges against Donald Trump

1:08.0

and his allies for their conduct in Georgia following the 2020 election.

1:13.0

But to prove that any of their behavior was criminal,

1:15.0

prosecutors must show criminal intent.

1:18.0

That Trump, Rudy Giuliani and others knew that what they were doing

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.