I'm John Batchel with Gregory Copley, Defense and Foreign Affairs, the author of a book

about the constitutional monarchy, and the reason I with Gregory Copley, Defense and Foreign Affairs, the author of a book about constitutional

monarchy. And the reason I come to it is that a headline in the London Times a couple of days

ago surprised the heck out of me. Lord Thornberry, one of the peers observing the status of the king,

suggested that the king should not attend the 250th anniversary of the peers observing the status of the king suggested that the king should not attend the 250th

anniversary of the United States's founding because of the risk of embarrassment. It wasn't filled

in by detail, but we can presume it had to do with the president's habit of spontaneously making

remarks that can be read as insulting and often are insulting.

The next day we had from the palace, however these things happened, they dropped the notes

out the window, I don't know, saying the king's going. Now, Gregory, I'm confused. Of course the

king's going. He's the king of Canada, is the king of New Zealand, it's the king of

Australia, and go anywhere he wants. He's invited to the United States. There'll be a great celebration.

Everybody will be in attendance. The king and queen are wonderful at these events, but I cannot

remove the anxiety about Donald Trump making remarks that would be embarrassing,

although I can't imagine what it is, given that Donald Trump's visit to the king,

I believe it was a formal state dinner at Windsor, went very happily.

So what is the concern in Britain?

You must have heard talk, lots of mumbling about

this. Absolutely. In fact, there was a lot of discussion there. And in fact, even the

leader of the opposition, Kemi Badenock, leader of the Conservative Party, came to the

defense of Sekea Stama

when Donald Trump, President Trump, issued another diatribe against Stama,

...