This is John Batchel. Speaking to Gregory Copley, just returned from Britain, where he attended

festivities in all directions, to ask about the newspaper article appearing this week that there

was anxiety in Britain about the king being embarrassed by Donald Trump if he attends or when he attends

the 250th anniversary, the summer of 2026 of the United States.

Gregory rejects that the king would hold back.

He'll come and he'll be gracious as he is.

And then the question is, can the king get involved in the controversy over Sir Kirs Starrmer,

who is very unpopular in all directions in Britain? And Kier Starrmer is in a position right

now to make decisions for Britain about the Gulf War. And the President of the United States

has spoken poorly of him in the meantime.

And there is a line that apparently is emerging about speaking poorly of secure Starmor,

but not the British people, not the contribution of Britain to any peace in our time.

Here's Gregory to explain.

Remember, Donald Trump is both head of government and head of state.

The king is head of state.

Secure Starmer is head of government.

It's an important distinction.

Gregory Copley.

Absolutely.

In fact, there was a lot of discussion there. And in fact, even the

former leader of the opposition, Kemi Badenock, leader of the Conservative Party, came to

the defence of Secere Stama when Donald Trump, President Trump, issued another diatribe against Stama,

...