Welcome, everyone, to Undisclosed Episode 21.

Our sponsors this week include Stamps.com, Zola, Wedding Registry, and the Georgia Innocence Project.

Make sure you're listening in for those spots later in the show and support our sponsors because they support us.

Until then, enjoy the program.

Music organizations like the Innocence Project, including the Georgia Innocence Project, where this case came from, are overwhelmed with requests from inmates every year, asking that their case be reviewed, and of course, they're all claiming innocence.

These organizations can only focus their extremely limited time and resources on the

cases in which they really do believe the incarcerated person is innocent. Now, when Susan presented

this case to Colin and I, we both knew that a group like GIP wouldn't be involved unless there

was something deeply flawed with the conviction. And we saw that it was pretty clear there was no evidence to support or even suggest that Joey was guilty of the crime.

But proving innocence, that's much harder.

Today, we'll show you the evidence we think does exactly that.

Hi and welcome to Undisclosed, the State v. Joey Watkins.

My name is Robya Chaudhry.

I'm an attorney and a fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace and the author of Adnan's story.

I'm here with my colleagues, as always, Susan Simpson and Colin Miller.

I'm Susan Simpson.

I'm an attorney with the Volkov Law Group, and I blog at viewfumel2.com.

I'm Colin Miller. I'm an associate dean and professor at the University of South Carolina School of Law,

and I blog at evidence prof blog.

Almost exactly a year ago now, while I was back in Atlanta for the holidays, I took a look at the cell phone evidence in this case for the first time. We'd finally decided on taking

Joey's case for season two about a couple weeks earlier, and I was still just trying to get

my bearings in the case to get all the

...