Hey true crime fans, tired of ads interrupting your gripping investigations.

Good news. With Amazon Music, you have access to the largest catalogue of ad-free top podcasts

included with your Prime membership. After all, ads shouldn't be the scariest thing about true crime.

To start listening, download the Amazon music app for free

or go to Amazon.co. UK slash ad-free podcasts. That's Amazon. That's Amazon.

That's Amazon.

UK slash ad-free podcasts

to catch up on the latest episodes without the ads. The Oh, uh, no, no. Hey everyone and welcome back to Truth and Justice reply brief.

In today's episode I'm going to be replying to the prosecutor's part 10 of their

non-Sayette analysis.

In part 10 Brent and Alice are breaking down Jay Wild's trial testimony.

Now here's the thing. J spent over five days on the witness stand.

So as you can imagine, an hour-long podcast doesn't really dig deep into the details.

But that wasn't really the point of this episode or the series, for that matter.

Part 10 of their series is kind of the glue that holds the guilty

narrative together. For nine episodes, Brett Nallis have breezed by problems in

the state's case, they've twisted, manipulated, and straight up changed the record to fit their narrative.

And at this point in their coverage a lot of listeners were finding themselves confused.

All these times and places that don't seem to make sense, but you're told that they do make sense.

And if you slow down and try to piece things together you realize that's impossible,

but every time you start to feel that way, these two professional prosecutors tell you that this is all normal

and every other possible theory that you've considered has been shot down, laughed at and

...