Hello Meg Chase's, CX Chase's rugby podcast, the podcast about rugby that doesn't take

itself all the game too seriously. Here in the rugby dungeon once again as we are 52 weeks

of the year making sure you get your rugby fix. 52 weeks of the year as we have been doing

for nearly 10 years and you know just remember that. When the world cup draws nearer and

other grassroots podcasters start crawling out of the woodwork saying how much they love

rugby. Oh, isn't the world cup great? Isn't the world cup great? Just remember it's

like I will admit I will admit being as the Wimbledon finals on as we record this video

and I watched tennis two weeks of the year and I get into a Wimbledon and I don't care

about it the rest of the year. I'm so glad you mentioned that. I wouldn't make a podcast

about it. Yeah, fair further. Well it's very interesting

what you make here because I post questions to my friends early on. Tennis is clearly

compelling, right? It's clearly compelling. So why does it all watch it? Like what can

we learn in the fact that tennis is only big once a year? Or is that what we should learn?

Is a rugby shouldn't try and be compelling for 52 weeks of the year. It should be compelling

for six weeks of the year and then shut up shop. That's an interesting point and it's

the same as when you watch the whether it's rider cup or the open golf. There's something

about watching because it's for all intensive purposes those shots are the same as you

would see on any PJ tour match in goal for any ATP tour match in tennis but the compelling

nature comes from the context that that game is operating in when you know there's something

serious on the line or is it and you connect it to the history and yeah. So there's one

of two things I can maybe it's the quality of the production and how seriously the commentators

are taking it. So do you know when you watch some you know random tennis tournament in

...