previously on breakdown.

When I asked you if you thought it started before she hired him and you responded

absolutely.

Why wouldn't you just have said in response? I don't know when it started I don't know why I didn't say I don't know

maybe again it's because you know what the truth is and that's why you answered exactly the way you did.

It's been two months of non-stop headlines worthy of a soap opera,

weeks of testimony with enough twists to make your head spin.

And now it's finally quiet.

Well, sort of.

We're waiting for Judge Scott McAfee to decide whether Fulton D.A. Fani Willis and her team should be

disqualified from the election interference case due to an actual or an appearance of a conflict

of interest.

We're certainly on the brink of a defining of interest.

We're certainly on the brink of a defining moment in this case.

McAfee said at a hearing last Friday he'll take about two weeks to make a decision, which

means we're expecting to hear something around March 15th.

His ruling could put the racketeering case back on track for Willis and her team

or potentially spell its end.

Which way will the judge rule?

Legal observers say it could go either way.

Even the attorneys who want Judge McAfee to disqualify Willis admit there isn't much precedent

for what we've seen play out in this case over the last two months.

...