Okay, everyone ready?

So let me, obviously, we, we are thrilled and I'm going to be honest, I have not read

the full opinion.

It's about 130 pages total, and I've only skimmed it, so, let's, I can't go into too much detail about it.

But the short of it is that we won on the alibi issue and the other issue, the cell tower issue was reversed.

So at the circuit court, we had won the cell tower issue and

lost the alibi issue, but it was essentially a flip-flop. The Court of Special Appeals reversed

the circuit court on both issues. That was attorney Justin Brown during a press conference on the afternoon of Thursday, March 29th,

when the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland issued its opinion in the Adnan-Said case.

Approximately nine and a half months after oral arguments and 21 months after Judge Welch issued his opinion granting Adnan a new trial,

the Court of Special Appeals, or COSA, issued

138 page 2 to 1 split decision.

COSA affirmed Judge Welch's opinion that Adnan is entitled to a new trial, but it reversed

his reasoning.

Specifically, Chief Judge Woodward and Judge Wright concluded that Adnan received ineffective

assistance of counsel based on trial counsel Christina Gutierrez's failure to contact alibi witness Asia McLean,

but that Adnan had waived the issue of whether Gutierrez was ineffective based on her failure

to use the AT&T disclaimer about incoming phone calls to challenge the Lincoln Park Kings.

It was a long opinion, 105 pages for the majority opinion,

and 23 pages for the dissent by Judge Graff. In this episode, we're going to break down each

part of the majority opinion and dissenting opinion and let you know what it means for Adnan

going forward. Hi and welcome to Undisclosed. This is a special bonus episode for the update in the

...