This episode of the serial dynasty is sponsored by Sean T. Fitness.

Sean T. is always looking for ways to keep you motivated.

So for a short period of time, Sean T. has made available a free 40-minute music mix.

To download, go to www.SeanT. Fitness.com-sla-music.

For those of you who download the mix, Sean will soon after be sending a written workout that will go along with that music.

You know he's always looking for ways to make you dig deeper.

Hello everybody and welcome back to this serial dynasty.

For this special episode of the serial dynasty where we will be exploring the possibility of a non-s guilt,

I'm going to recommend to all of you at this point maybe hit pause and pack a lunch because this is going to be a long episode.

As I've mentioned in previous episodes, my investigation method revolves around examining evidence, developing a theory from that evidence,

and then going back to the evidence and looking deeper to see if there's a way to disprove my theory.

This method has led me to the place where I stand today, which is that I now believe that a non-sciad is innocent.

In order to keep true with my method, I've done a lot of reading and a lot of researching, trying to find actual evidence that actually points to a non-s guilt.

And I've been unable to do so. The state was able to convict a non based on the testimony of Jay, supposedly corroborated by cell phone records,

and then they piled on with some circumstantial evidence.

At this point, all of us know that Jay is, let's say, less than credible.

The testimony that he gave that the jury heard at trial was a polished version that had changed multiple times over the preceding months leading up to the trial.

Most of those changes revolved around new information that was obtained by the police regarding cell phone evidence.

This has led me to believe that the idea of the cell phone evidence corroborating Jay's testimony no longer holds up.

When you look at cell records and then create a narrative afterward, based on those cell records, those two things no longer corroborate each other.

So what we're left with is circumstantial evidence.

And personally, and I've been challenged on this, but I would not even consider these things evidence.

...