Hello, good afternoon everybody, thanks for joining us, huge thank you to everybody who was

in the live chat last night with the Russell Brand Roundtable debates, I had an absolute

fantastic time getting the opinions of so many people over such a short period of time.

Today we're going to break down all the latest Russell Brand news of which that is a absolute

ton and the biggest news story in the last 24 hours is of course rumble rejecting the UK

government's quote disturbing letter as video site defends letting Russell Brand monetize content

on rumble. Yes, Carol Dynage again she pops up everywhere doesn't she? Do you remember all that

coverage we were doing with Steeples and we've got Steeples back at 5 p.m. tomorrow? It's already been

set up. Do you remember all that coverage we were doing here at Wood's Skullfield? The Dynage always gets

in there to set things straight for the media establishment. All right so let's look a bit

more closely at what has happened here. Rumble has rebooted the UK government's request

were Dynage asked if rumble would stop Russell Brand from earning money on that platform

following the beep allegations. The statement was issued on rumble's ex-twitter feed

that the company had received an extremely disturbing letter from a committee chair from the

British government. In response it said it emphatically rejects the UK Parliament's demands and

would not join a cancel culture mob. We are going to look at the full statements so let me scroll

down to them. Caroline Dynage is the chair of the commons culture media and sport committee.

She's widely reported to have written to several social media platforms including rumble over the

allegations. What I cannot fathom is if someone has got crimes alleged against them and a investigative

documentary team such as Channel 4 dispatches as unearthed these alleged crimes then that naturally

becomes a police matter. How on earth does the British government jump into the mix when all we've

got presently are allegations that have not been processed by a criminal court? This boggles my mind

...