RUSHING PELL-MELL INTO MADNESS?: The Twenty-Fifth Amendment and its Critics

My History Can Beat Up Your Politics

Bruce Carlson

Politics, History, News

4.6 • 1.2K Ratings

🗓️ 2 February 2026

⏱️ 31 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On the surface, the 25th Amendment is a perfect mechanism for providing a stable transition of Presidential power. But that's not what early state ratification critics thought. And it's not how Hollywood writers oft envision it. When debating the 25th amendment to the US Constitution, one state legislator called it rushing "pell-mell into madness." Another said it did not complete the very purpose it intended and should go back to Congress for fixing. And still another said it has a huge hole around the vice presidency. These state quibbles were enough for a scare, but the states ratified anyway, in the wake of the Cuban Missile Crisis and a bipartisan push. But were the arguments valid? Although the 25th is designed to potentially remove a President, it is also designed to avoid doing that if at all possible. It was written by politicians to avoid politics, and as several TV and movie writers have found, it could create lots of politics. If you find it confusing, you aren't alone. Some opponents during its ratification took a look at what came out of the hard work of Sen. Kefauver and Bayh and said - why was it written this way? And not all their criticisms were answered. In this episode we look at the 25th and objections raised in Pennsylvania, Arkansas and Colorado that might have sunk the amendment. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	You're listening to an Airwave Media podcast.
0:04.3	I'm Howard Dory.
0:05.7	And I'm Jess Dory.
0:06.9	And we host Plotting Through the Presidents.
0:09.5	We take deeply researched, deeply irreverent dives into the myths, mysteries, and scandals of the men and women who shaped America.
0:17.0	Join us as we dive deep into topics like...
0:20.0	The undeniable ribs of Erin Burr.
0:22.6	The what now?
0:23.6	And the odd feeding habits of everyone's favorite founder, John Adams.
0:27.6	Subscribe and follow plotting through the presidents now to plot along with us.
0:31.6	Find out more at plodpodpod.com.
0:34.6	Life's full of big money decisions.
0:36.6	Dividend versus growth stocks, tapping home equity, even
0:40.2	navigating tariffs. And for every smart tip out there, there's another one that sounds smart,
0:45.0	but isn't. That's where NerdWallet's Smart Money podcast comes in. I'm Sean Piles, a certified
0:49.9	financial planner professional. And I'm Elizabeth Ayola. On NerdWallet Smart Money podcast, our finance
0:55.0	journalists do the homework so you can make confident wealth building moves. Whether you're building
0:59.5	your portfolio or protecting it, we've got the facts and a little fun along the way. Follow NerdWallet
1:04.8	Smart Money podcast on your favorite podcast app. And what really drives the 25th Amendment is this.
1:15.9	The nuclear era. It's very rare to have a constitutional amendment.
1:44.7	We've had a country for 250 years now, and it's 27 times, and the last time was more than 30 years ago,
1:54.4	and since the last amendment, the 27th Amendment, was really an extension of a movement from the 1790s,
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Bruce Carlson, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Bruce Carlson and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.