#Roskosmos: Launching a rover for the Moon. Bob Zimmerman BehindtheBlack.com
The John Batchelor Show
John Batchelor
4.5 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 12 August 2023
⏱️ 15 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
@Batchelorshow
#Roskosmos: Launching a rover for the Moon. Bob Zimmerman BehindtheBlack.com
https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/russia-launches-luna-25-to-the-moon/
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | At TFL, we're making journeys safer for everyone, and that includes improving safety on London's roads. |
| 0:07.4 | That's why we and London boroughs are lowering more speed limits to 20 miles per hour, |
| 0:12.3 | because 20 miles per hour roads have already reduced collisions resulting in deaths or |
| 0:16.8 | serious injuries by 24%. That is how we're making journeys in London safer and brighter for everyone. |
| 0:24.8 | Such TFL improvement plan to the Mayor of London and TFL every journey matters. |
| 0:34.5 | This is CBSI in the world. I'm John Batcher, Bob Zimmerman. He keeps the website behind the black. |
| 0:39.7 | Bob, a very good evening to you. What is Retraction Watch? Thank you. |
| 0:45.6 | John Retraction Watch is a website that was founded on the same time I founded behind |
| 0:50.5 | the black 13 years ago, and the goal of the two guys who run it is to document the number of |
| 0:57.6 | papers that are retracted, peer review papers that are retracted by scientists or by journals, |
| 1:04.8 | because of bad work, dishonesty, fraud, mistakes, whatever. They just track every paper they |
| 1:14.8 | get retracted. They published an op-ed recently in the Guardian in Britain where they |
| 1:20.6 | noted, shockingly, that the number of scientific peer-reviewed papers that have been retracted |
| 1:26.9 | each year since the beginning of this century in 2000 has increased yearly on astonishing |
| 1:34.7 | 13,750 percent. They had 40 retractions worldwide in 2000, and in 22, they had 5,500. |
| 1:48.8 | Following the science, what do you call it? Scientific research world, as I do. There's no doubt |
| 1:56.4 | that the number of errors, dishonesty, fraud, mistakes in science work has been increasing |
| 2:04.8 | exponentially in the last quarter century to a point where it's now you cannot, you cannot, |
| 2:12.0 | and you must not take on faith any scientific paper you read even if it's peer-reviewed. |
| 2:18.0 | You want to do that, but you should not do that anymore. It should be questioned every |
| 2:22.5 | sense. Now, of course, everything should always be questioned, but in the past, you could have |
| 2:26.5 | faith that the science editors at journals and peer-review were doing the proper due diligence, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Batchelor, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of John Batchelor and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

