You're going to do. Well, greetings and welcome to the dividing line. I'm not having run everything today, so we actually had music. I did fix that by the way. It's El Media Player. I couldn't remember that name, but it's now in the dock so I can get to the music real fast now.

Anyway, I have a feeling that for the next couple weeks I might be doing a few of those programs again,

and hopefully I will do a better job than I did last time.

Start off with a little look at a biblical text and then talk about some of the current events going on.

I haven't, I don't know how long ago it was now that we, because I know we were in the other studio, the last time that we

talked about the two-part Romans silliness.

That's what it is.

Just silly.

Have we heard anything from anybody.

Nobody cares.

But if you weren't listening, there's this wild-eyed,

let's find a way to get around Calvinism, there's a lot of wild-eyed, let's find a way to get around of Calvinism and stuff out there from Molinism onward.

But it's this idea that Romans is only written to the Jews in the first part and then switches over the Gentiles and just this and it's just so

disconnected from the text it's the classic example of taking a lens and you know creating your own narrative and then reading the

text of the Bible through it. It's ice a Jesus on steroids from people who should know better but the the drive to

avoid what scripture teaches about man's nature and God's nature is very very strong and the

traditions of men that go along with that. Anyway the only reason I mentioned this I

have not looked at any of the videos I think they're up to like eight now I think I saw on

Twitter eight videos promoting this stuff.

There's no reason to.

We refuted the first two, mainly the first one which was the foundation.

So without a foundation, Billy can't stand, it's been refuted, there's no reason to waste further time on it.

...