We'll continue in a series of podcasts on this YouTube video that's on you and the

Kalam Cosmological Argument.

It's called Physicist and Philosopher's Reply to the Kalam Cosmological Argument featuring

Penrose, Hawking, and Gooth is getting a lot of views and this four-part series fits

neatly into the four segments that the video addresses.

Last podcast we talked about the first philosophical argument for the beginning of the universe.

And today we're going to talk about the second philosophical argument for the beginning

of the universe that the video talks about.

And there's no way, again, that we can possibly respond to everything in the video.

It's a long video, but we're playing some representative clips and Bill, you'll be giving

some additional responses and the question of the week feature at reasonablefaith.org.

So people can get more there.

Yes, that's right, Kevin.

I'll be doing four questions of the week on these four sections of the video so that

folks can have this in writing as well as our podcast.

Okay.

Here's the first clip then of the podcast today and the narrator introduces a clip from

you talking about Saturn and completing its orbit around the Sun.

Another example given to try and refute infinity are the orbits of Jupiter and Saturn.

Suppose that for every one orbit, Saturn completes around the Sun, Jupiter completes two.

The longer they orbit, the further Saturn falls behind.

Now what have these two planets have always been orbiting the Sun from eternity past, which

...