On this episode of Narcissist Apocalypse Q&A, everyone.

I am Brandon Chadwick, and today we're going to be discussing the abuse manipulation tactic

called plausible deniability.

But before we get to that, if you want to be a guest on our Survivor's Story episodes,

please do go to our website at Narcissistapocalypse.com.

Top of the page, there's a button that says guest form.

When you click on that button it takes

you to our guest forum page and there you can read all of our instructions and then send us an

email at narcissist apoclips at gmail.com or fill out our guest form and press the submit

button and please do send it in the format that we ask for and we're always looking

for more stories so please do send in your stories so today we are going to be talking about

plausible deniability and abusers and what was interesting to me when I was diving into this topic

was that I found that many of the videos and articles

that you read on the internet have really co-opted the actual definition of plausible

deniability and many of us, including myself, have been using it incorrectly, or I believe that we've

been using it incorrectly. So today, we're going to try and redefine what it means

specifically how I think it should be used. And this is my opinion. And so the definition that

most of us here that I think is

incorrect, and that is in day-to-day situations, people believe plausible deniability involves

demonstrating that little to no evidence exists to prove guilt. If not enough evidence exists

to prove guilt, then innocence must be presumed.

So in this definition, plausible deniability refers to there being any reasonable chance,

...