This is LBC from Global, leading Britain's conversation with James O'Brien.

Three minutes after ten is the time. I don't know where the phrase comes from about the anticipation being the best part,

but I think I explained to you last year that the longer this delay went on, the damper or the less

exciting, for one of a better word, the so-called Russia report would be. I mean, the problem is it

comes out at half past 10, okay? So we will be across it. We'll be on it like a car bonnet,

but I don't know how long it will take

to be able to absorb enough elements

to inform our conversations together.

We should be talking to Dominic Grief,

who of course was chair of the committee

when the report was signed off

and sundry other interested parties.

But the telegraph are already spinning this morning

in one direction, presumably under instruction from Downing Street. They tried to influence the result

of the Scottish independence referendum, but they didn't go near the Brexit vote. Something

which, as you just heard in the news bulletin, Pauline Neville Jones, one of the country's most senior spies formally, was unconvinced by.

I don't know. Let's get that front and centre to begin with. But here's my personal perspective, a possibly problem, but certainly perspective.

If there's nothing juicy in it, why would they not have published it sooner?

And given that it is being published with some fairly chunky bits missing, how confident

can we really be that the full picture will become clear? It's an odd morning this, because

it is in many ways the only story in town, but we don't actually know what's in the story

for half an hour. So I thought we could chew the fact together, if you fancy it, about what the key concerns maybe should be

...