meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Street Cop Podcast

Refusing Police Commands

Street Cop Podcast

Street Cop Training

Education

4.9967 Ratings

🗓️ 16 October 2021

⏱️ 26 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this archive episode, Dennis answers questions on case laws regarding refusal to follow police commands. Recorded on 04/19/2018. State v Doss 2002 - https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/appellate-division-published/1992/254-n-j-super-122-1.html?fbclid=IwAR3VADQXd2nKrzEPBtRk3MOniOpmwiYw--JK3I7zyqQ43e6qJmT1Y_GRJRs (https://law.justia.com/.../1992/254-n-j-super-122-1.html) In the present case, once the totality of the circumstances observed by the police justifiably aroused an "articulable suspicion" which warranted their stopping and interrogating defendant, he was legally obligated to halt in response to their shouted orders to stop and, subject to his privilege against self-incrimination, he had a duty to answer their inquiries.[4] As the Court stated in State v. Lashinsky, 81 N.J. 1, 11, 404 A.2d 1121 (1979), "where an officer's instructions are obviously reasonable, *130 in furtherance of his duties, an individual toward whom such instructions are directed has a correlative duty to obey them." See also State v. Taylor, 121 N.J. Super. 395, 297 A.2d 216 (Cty.Dist.Ct. 1972). When defendant continued his flight from the pursuing police officers despite their shouted orders to halt, his refusal to obey their orders, together with all of the other circumstances of the case, gave the police reasonable cause to believe that he had committed or was then committing a criminal offense. See Kolender v. Lawson, supra, 461 U.S. at 366 n. 4, 103 S. Ct. at 1863 n. 4, 75 L. Ed. 2d at 915 n. 4 (Brennan, J., concurring) ("[R]eactions [by individuals to a properly limited Terry encounter], such as flight, may often provide the necessary information, in addition to that the officers already possess, to constitute probable cause."); LaFave, supra, § 9.2(d) at 369 (quoting Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure at 284-85 (1975)). Consequently, when Detective Parks and the other policeman caught up with defendant and handcuffed him when he tripped and fell, they had probable cause to effect his arrest. The concurrent seizure and search of the cap which he held crumpled up in his hand, revealing the cocaine which it contained, was lawful because it was incident to a lawful arrest. See State v. McNair, 60 N.J. 8, 285 A.2d 553 (1972). 2C:29-1 condemns "interference"; it states, "A person commits an offense if he purposely ... prevents or attempts to prevent a public servant from lawfully performing an official function by means of ... physical interference or obstacle...." (Emphasis added.) The implication of Lashinsky is that refusing to obey the order of a policeman constitutes "interference" within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 2C:29-1. See also State v. Manning, 146 N.J. Super. 589, 370 A.2d 499 (App.Div. 1977) (An automobile passenger's refusal to comply with a policeman's order to return to his car "interfere[d]" within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 2A:170-29; cf. Township of East Brunswick v. Malfitano, 108 N.J. Super. 244, 260 A.2d 862 (App.Div. 1970); State v. Taylor, 38 N.J. Super. 6, 118 A.2d 36 (App.Div. 1955)). The second sentence of N.J.S.A. 2C:29-1 says, "This section does not apply to flight by a person charged with crime, refusal to submit to arrest, failure to perform a legal duty other than an official duty, or any other means of avoiding compliance with law without affirmative interference with governmental functions." That sentence does not exclude defendant Doss from its purview. He had not been charged with a crime although he was suspected of one. He had not refused to submit to an arrest; he was seeking to evade a stop short of an arrest. See State v. Perlstein, 206 N.J. Super. 246, 502 A.2d 81 (App.Div. 1985), where this court held that a driver who refused to show her driving credentials to a policeman and who moved her car contrary to his directions was guilty of "attempt[ing] to prevent a public servant from lawfully performing an official function by means of... physical interference" in violation of N.J.S.A....

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I have a lot of my mind this

0:02.0

a way.

0:03.0

I don't know.

0:05.0

You trying to be a hot.

0:08.0

You trying to be a street cop?

0:10.0

I have a lot of my mind this evening. I hope I don't forget all this stuff. I should have wrote notes down before I came live.

0:17.0

Welcome to Street Cop training, the place we were giving videos on how to do your job better as a cop.

0:21.0

For the people I've seen the post earlier,

0:24.1

I think we have almost all the spots filled up,

0:25.7

but maybe one or two spots left for Jesse Hartnets.

0:28.6

He's a street cop training instructor who was shot

0:31.4

in a line of duty.

0:32.3

He gives a course called the will to live.

0:34.2

We're doing our first one for free class for Sri cop group members only

0:38.1

at the Madison Police Department May 9th. If you want to comment on a free spot

0:42.0

we have a few spots open on that one.

0:44.9

The first thing I want to do is address a comment I have in a video we reposted from earlier, I think

0:49.3

December of 2016, so almost a year and a half ago. and what I did the video was regarding license plate

0:54.8

lookups and checks and how to make one bulletproof we have like 5,000 views on it

1:00.2

4.4,000 and it's a really good piece of advice to give people.

1:05.9

And I'm adamant about it, I stand behind it,

1:07.7

and everything that I put out here I know is 100% correct.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Street Cop Training, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Street Cop Training and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.