4.6 • 1.5K Ratings
🗓️ 30 May 2025
⏱️ 27 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | What you know, alibiers. Welcome to another episode of Pretty Lies and Alibis. I'm Gigi. It's Thursday, |
0:05.9 | May 29. Sorry I didn't get the recap in yesterday, but I knew today was a half day, so I thought I would |
0:11.9 | just combine both. This testimony for me personally was a little bit hard to follow at times due to all |
0:18.3 | of the math and the data that they were referring to. |
0:22.6 | So I wanted to make sure I went back and rewatched a few things I wasn't clear about |
0:27.0 | and just throw it all together and do a bigger one today. |
0:30.9 | We had Judson Welcher from Aperture back on the stand. |
0:35.5 | He was on direct exam at this point very briefly before we went over into |
0:40.5 | Cross. The state asked about the pain on his arm while doing these tests, and the witness said |
0:46.4 | the paint never went on the underside of his arm. And the SUV's damage is consistent with a |
0:52.3 | collision with John, and it would account for him hitting his head on the ground very hard. |
0:57.0 | As far as side swipes, what's being hit doesn't accelerate at the same speed of the object that hits it. |
1:05.0 | There is no complete momentum transfer and this leads to little damage being left on the car. It makes it hard for him |
1:14.1 | to compute force with these types of collisions. When someone is hit by a side swipe, it doesn't |
1:20.2 | show the broken bones that a direct hit would, and again, says steps taken by the person being hit would determine ultimately where they land. |
1:30.5 | On cross, they go into the witness's conclusions that weren't based solely on the physical data, |
1:36.4 | and witness statements were taken into consideration when the witness made decisions. |
1:42.0 | Both the witness and the defense agree that the goal of scientific methodology |
1:46.0 | is to reach their conclusion without bias. The witness is asked if one of the first questions he asked is how did this happen. |
1:55.0 | He says that's actually one of his last questions. When he starts, he has several hypothesis in mind, and as more information |
2:02.8 | comes in, he may have even more hypothesis in mind when he is investigating a case. The defense |
2:09.5 | points out that Aperture was hired by the Commonwealth two and a half years after John's death |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in 18 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from GiGi McKelvey, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of GiGi McKelvey and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.