What you know, alibiers. Welcome to another episode of Pretty Lies and Alibis. I'm Gigi. Good to have you

here. It's Thursday, August 28th. Sorry I didn't get yesterday's Part 2 out. Went and spent some time with

my Grammy in the hospital. She had a procedure yesterday and was not feeling good at all last night.

But she's much better today, so we are back at it. Yesterday, we left off with Sergeant

Corbett on cross-exam. And essentially, they're just attacking the cell phone records and the

reliability of locations and things like that. They talk about the call detail records being

generated by the carriers for business purposes, and they don't provide precise

geolocation for those handsets. The defense points out that the closer you are to a cell tower,

the better signal and then the better location you can get. They ask at the text that Donna asked

Charlie to delete, was it actually deleted? And it wasn't completely,

it was still in Charlie's eye cloud. They point out that you can't tell who answered the landline

during all the calls they mentioned and you don't know what was discussed between all the parties.

And there's no context of some of the text messages that took place, and the

witness agrees. They called to question the drive that Sergeant Corbett recreating saying that he

had no records of any traffic conditions from 2014. He didn't factor in any stops that Donna and

Harvey may have had, and they can't physically put Donna's phone at Charlie's

house. The witness says that their handsets have created events at their homes, so you can say

where they were. He's asked if the seven calls between Charlie and Donna during the first trip

they made to Tallahassee indicate a spike in calls. And the witness said they were not an

abnormal amount of communications between the two. For the July trip, he points out that the

killers were there for a 38-hour time period. And the witness says there was the potential

to exchange information between all of the parties in the 38-hour time frame.

...