All right, Alexander, let's talk about Dimitriov in the United States, the meetings that he took in the U.S., which were, as he put it, focused on investment and on business.

That's his job.

That's what he's there to do.

But he made it a point as he was doing the media rounds to tell everyone that was interviewing

him from the US media, Fox News and CNN, that he's not in the US to talk about front lines,

diplomacy, negotiations, military stuff.

He said, I'm here to discuss negotiations on the business side

of things, a normalization of business ties between the U.S. and Russia. And Dimitriyev, when he returned

to Moscow, he said the meeting was a success, cautiously optimistic, I believe, are the words that he used in

describing how the Russians feel about Dimitriyev's trip to the United States.

On the Ukraine side, you have the minerals deal, which is just never ending, never ending.

And I wonder if we ever are going to get a deal or if this is just a long, drawn-out clown world segment.

But if Zelensky were to sign that minerals deal, it would effectively mean the

end of Ukraine. Even the telegraph, actually, in an article that they put out yesterday, which was

your standard UK propaganda, Russia bad, Trump bad, Zelensky's Churchill, and all of these things.

They even had to admit that Trump is putting the squeeze on Zelensky to sign the minerals

deal, and it would mean the Ukraine resource is going completely to the United States forever.

So even the telegraph could not avoid the catastrophe that would be the signing of the Trump

mineral deal.

So your thoughts on minerals deals and on the B.3, whichever one you want to get into first.

Well, let's talk about the minerals deal first because my own view about the mineral

steel is that whoever drew it up and it's clearly been approved by Trump himself, has pitched

...