RAW COURT AUDIO: Karen Read’s Legal Battle Intensifies as Courtroom Tensions Rise-PART 4
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
True Crime Today
3.3 • 907 Ratings
🗓️ 26 February 2025
⏱️ 41 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Brennan had introduced documents and a $24,000 invoice, arguing that Read’s attorneys engaged experts from ARCCA, an accident reconstruction firm, despite previously telling the court they had not met with these witnesses. The ARCCA experts are crucial to the defense’s claim that Read did not strike her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe, with her SUV and leave him to die in a snowstorm on January 29, 2022. Read’s attorneys contend she was framed and that law enforcement was involved in O’Keefe’s death.
When the hearing resumed, Judge Cannone noted inconsistencies between Brennan’s claims and her recollection but also questioned why defense attorney Alan Jackson had told her in February that there was no additional discovery related to the ARCCA witnesses.
Defense attorney Robert Alessi pushed back, arguing that any inconsistencies were due to miscommunications rather than intentional deception. “I don’t think it’s the defense that’s creating ghosts, allusions, and shields here,” he said, throwing Brennan’s own words back at him. He also pointed out what he called multiple misstatements from Brennan, arguing that the prosecution had not been entirely transparent either.
Brennan countered that the ARCCA witnesses were falsely presented as independent. “We know that we are getting a fraction of the story,” he said, suggesting that missing records indicate additional undisclosed communication between the defense and these witnesses.
Outside the courthouse, Read was asked whether she feared losing members of her defense team. “Of course, I’d be worried to lose any member of my defense team,” she said. When asked what that would mean, she added, “It would mean an appeal.”
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is a special report from True Crime Today and the Hidden Killers podcast. |
| 0:08.2 | I'm Tony Bruske. Thanks for joining us. |
| 0:10.0 | Let's head to the courtroom where Karen Reid's hearing is resuming after the grave concern comment was raised last week by Judge Beverly Canoni. |
| 0:19.9 | Let's go to the courtroom. |
| 0:25.5 | Thank you, Mom. |
| 0:26.4 | All we could call the United States |
| 0:28.8 | Attired's Office in the answer to the court. |
| 0:30.5 | All right, I appreciate that. |
| 0:32.7 | Sorry to talk. |
| 0:33.9 | And so the portrayal in that there was a rules of the road, there was no such rules of the road. |
| 0:40.3 | Neither attorney Lally or McLaughlin ever contacted any witness directly because they understood that that was precluded. |
| 0:51.3 | And so there was an opportunity to call or discuss or have a conversation, |
| 0:57.0 | share direct examinations, or have emails with these witnesses. In fact, it's underscored, |
| 1:02.0 | isn't it, by the emails that we received where Dr. Wolf replies at the 24th |
| 1:06.5 | saying, U.S. Attorney's Office essentially told them to hold off on communications it doesn't seem |
| 1:11.8 | like it would be a very clear rule of the road to have independent conversation with these witnesses |
| 1:17.0 | and then be cautioned that that no longer was vital and so inevitably it was the understanding |
| 1:25.0 | that nobody would be speaking to the witnesses. |
| 1:29.5 | And I did see in the transcript, in the board here, where it was asked, will you available |
| 1:34.0 | to the Commonwealth? |
| 1:35.2 | And the witness said, yes. |
| 1:37.3 | I don't know any basis whatsoever of the witness to suggest that there was any invitation |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

