This is Hidden Killers with Tony Bruske. The Delphi case has taken so many twists, so many turns.

It's hard to keep up if you're not watching it the way we are at an obsessive level where you wake up having nightmares about it.

But one thing is clear, there are serious questions about how this case was handled from the start

between ignored confessions, missing evidence, and possible conflicts of interest,

it seems more and more likely that the wrong man is behind bars,

while key players in law enforcement and prosecution continue

to dodge transparency. Joining me today, Eric Fattis Seasons defense attorney. We're going to be

talking about this case and exactly where it is all going, breaking down the latest legal

bombshells. Eric is someone who's been on both sides of the courtroom. Let's start here.

If prosecutors really did suppress evidence of another confession,

and we're talking about the alleged confession in jail of Ron Logan to Ritchie Davis,

how big of a deal is legality? And could this be enough to unravel

Richard Allen's conviction? It would be bigger than big, and it would absolutely be enough

for an appellate court to review it and grant a new trial. The prosecution is always required

to send to the defense not only incriminating

evidence, but also evidence that tends to show the defendant is not guilty, that there was a case

called Brady v. Maryland in, I think, the 60s, that said, if the prosecution does not do that,

it is a tremendous violation and oftentimes results in a reversal.

The big thing that we hear the second that this gets brought up from the prosecution

and from anybody who thinks that Richard Allen is guilty is he miserably failed and

miserably underlined because that's the term they always use in terms from the investigators, about a lie detector that was allegedly conducted on Rishi Davis.

We don't have any date, time, who conducted it, anything about actually when it would have occurred or anything about the questions asked.

...