meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

RAW COURT AUDIO-Karen Read: Post-Jury Selection Court Hearing-PART 1

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

Tony Brueski

True Crime, News, News Commentary

2.2614 Ratings

🗓️ 16 April 2025

⏱️ 33 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

RAW COURT AUDIO-Karen Read: Post-Jury Selection Court Hearing-PART 1
Opening statements in the retrial of Karen Read are set for April 22, with a jury of nine men and nine women sworn in. Read is accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe, by allegedly hitting him with her SUV during a snowstorm in January 2022, then leaving him outside to die. The defense argues O’Keefe was beaten inside the Canton home of officer Brian Albert, bitten by a dog, and left outside in a cover-up involving local law enforcement. The first trial ended in a mistrial in July 2024 after jurors were unable to reach a unanimous verdict. 

Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're listening to live courtroom coverage of the trial of Karen Reed from the Hidden

0:05.1

Killers podcast and True Crime Today. Now, back to the courtroom.

0:10.2

I request would be that a determination on whether or not there's a voir dire of Lieutenant Wing

0:19.9

abide the motion in the discussion with regard to Dr.

0:25.4

Crosby.

0:26.0

So in conclusion, Your Honor, we respectfully request that the Court deny the request

0:33.3

of the Commonwealth to have a voir dire hearing on Lieutenant Wing, at a minimum, wait for that

0:40.5

determination until a court reads the report of Lieutenant Wing.

0:45.6

Thank you, Your Honor.

0:46.7

Okay.

0:47.7

All right, so there's also a motion for reconsideration regarding Dr. Crosby.

0:55.0

I can tell you regarding reconsideration.

0:59.0

I've found that he is an expert.

1:02.0

I am not going to reconsider whether or not Dr. Crosby is an expert.

1:06.0

I'm not going to reconsider whether he can testify as something is consistent or inconsistent with dog bites.

1:13.6

But Mr. Brennan, I don't see how you're going to have him testify as to whether these marks could have

1:23.6

come from Chloe, the specific dog.

1:28.3

I think that you can certainly talk about measurements that may have been made, but I don't

1:35.0

see how he can testify that this either was or was not this particular dog, particularly

1:42.6

in light of the most recent National Academy of Science

1:46.8

report that found that no evidence of an existing scientific basis for identifying an

1:53.4

individual to the exclusion of all others via bite mark evidence.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.