KAREN READ Post-Jury Selection Court Hearing-PART 2

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

Tony Brueski

True Crime, News, News Commentary

2.2 • 614 Ratings

🗓️ 16 April 2025

⏱️ 32 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Opening statements in the retrial of Karen Read are set for April 22, with a jury of nine men and nine women sworn in. Read is accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe, by allegedly hitting him with her SUV during a snowstorm in January 2022, then leaving him outside to die. The defense argues O’Keefe was beaten inside the Canton home of officer Brian Albert, bitten by a dog, and left outside in a cover-up involving local law enforcement. The first trial ended in a mistrial in July 2024 after jurors were unable to reach a unanimous verdict.
Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	You're listening to live courtroom coverage of the trial of Karen Reed from the Hidden
0:05.1	Killers podcast and True Crime Today. Now, back to the courtroom.
0:11.6	Right. Ms. Little was, I was getting to the point, but she emphasized, and I will emphasize
0:17.4	it here, the one thing that the U.S. government has said
0:21.3	to both the Commonwealth and to us
0:24.1	is in furtherance of their testimony,
0:26.0	in furtherance of their engagement,
0:27.6	they still are not allowed to detail
0:30.2	confidential communications
0:31.8	that they had with the U.S. government
0:33.1	and the Department of Justice.
0:34.3	But can they testify as to what they did?
0:38.2	Yes, yes. That is on... Can they testify as to what they did? Yes.
0:38.8	Yes.
0:39.8	Can they testify under what direction they did these things?
0:45.4	Well, they can certainly testify to what they did.
0:48.8	Absolutely.
0:49.5	That is on the table.
0:50.6	Every bit of testing, every bit of analysis.
0:52.6	But why they did it?
0:54.0	What their communications did it what their
0:54.4	communications were what their directives were that is confidential and can I see
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.