It's our two of Budweiser's weekday sports meet with Irish Breakdown.com and that means, Vince, are you ready for rapid fire?

Oh, hour two, baby, rapid fire. Here we go. Got some good stuff today. It is real good stuff. A little troll action potentially. I'm excited.

All right. All right. I like it. I like it. Let's see where it goes.

So let's talk about officiating, Vince. Back in the great week, the ACC crew that was working the

Notre Dame game was brutal. Marcus Freeman said after the game that they sending clips of plays to the ACC office or whatever other conference, the officiating crew, comes from to have a look at.

I asked him today what that process is like, how quickly they get a response, what the dialogue is like, how often, you know, how quickly the feedback comes back and how often they get,

you know, response that says, hey, maybe we got this one wrong.

Here's what Marcus Freeman said.

Do you.

So, I mean, we usually get the response back by Wednesdays.

But, you know, it can be as black and white as saying we agree with why we called it and here's what we saw or, you know, no, you're right, we missed it.

They own it.

If they missed a call, they'll say they missed a call.

And in some is, here's why we called it.

We can understand where you're coming from,, here's why we called it. We can understand where you're coming from,

but here's why we called it. And, you know, there's got to be some human element to it, too.

It's not perfect, right? We want our officials to be perfect. They're not perfect. We want our

players to be perfect, not perfect. But it's the dialogue and a clarification, I think that's

more important than anything is the ability to say, hey, we got it right, and this is why we got it

right, or we got it wrong, and we own it, and we're apologetic about it, and we'll try to be better.

And so that's kind of how that dialogue goes. It's interesting, Vince.

You can't be perfect, but I guess I think the ones that were magnified the most were instant,

...