Quick Bits: Karen Read New Filings, One Juror Requests The Jury List Remain Sealed. Another Juror Comes Forward.

The Emily Show

Baker Media, LLC.

Entertainment News, True Crime, News

4.9 • 2.1K Ratings

🗓️ 19 July 2024

⏱️ 18 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A juror has written to the court requesting not to make the jury list public due to safety concerns. The judge granted the motion, sealing the names indefinitely. The defense has filed a motion that another juror came forward explaining that the jury acquitted Karen on counts 1 and 3. This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	I'm legal analyst Emily D Baker.
0:02.0	This is the quick bits where I break down just the main points
0:05.6	at the pop culture and entertainment cases
0:07.6	I'm currently covering on YouTube and The Emily Show Podcast.
0:11.3	Let's get into it.
0:18.0	There are new filings in the Karen Reed case today. It's July 18th, 2024.
0:20.0	Remember, there is a hearing in this case, July 22nd, Monday.
0:24.7	That hearing is supposed to be a trial setting because of the mistrial declared.
0:29.8	After the mistrial was declared, Alan Jackson filed a motion and then supplementals stating that two jurors had reached out to him directly
0:36.0	to say that they had reached verdicts on counts one and three.
0:39.0	Counts one and three did not have lesser included
0:41.0	like count two, count one was the second degree homicide.
0:44.7	Count two was the hit and run causing death. The jury said that they couldn't decide the
0:49.2	charges on count two. That is the one that had the lesser includes.
0:53.6	Alan Jackson filed those, spoke to two jurors.
0:56.6	David Yanetti filed a declaration that two jurors had spoken, but the information relayed to him came from intermediaries
1:06.4	through someone speaking to him so it was like friend of a friend conversation and
1:11.2	that took more of a minute or was more really a less direct line of
1:19.2	communication and more of a game of telephone. The Commonwealth responded and said
1:22.2	there's nothing the court can do. We're not
1:25.2	violating Karen Reed's rights. We don't need to inquire into the jurors if they had reached
1:29.6	verdicts. We don't need to do any of this. We can retry her on whatever we want to retry her on and this is why.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Baker Media, LLC., and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Baker Media, LLC. and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.