It's a reasonable faith with Dr. William Lane Craig. Thanks for checking in. I'm Kevin Harris. We're picking up where we left off last time answering questions Dr Craig is received from all over the world.

By the way, you can ask Dr Craig a question online at reasonable faith.org just read the

guidelines before you submit your question and hopefully you've discovered what a

great resource the question of the Week is.

You know, it's hard for Dr Craig to narrow down

one question each week, but it's always interesting.

Whenever you can, please support the work of reasonable faith financially and prayerfully.

You can do that safely and quickly at the website, reasonable faith.org, any sized gift

is so appreciated. Now let's get back to the studio with Dr Craig.

Next question.

Hello Professor Craig, I know you have used the Kalam cosmological argument in your debates, but you do not use the

prime mover argument ever. I email you today because I want to know what you think of the argument.

Is it any good? Isn't the premise that what is in motion is

put in motion by another as plausible as the premise that what begins to exist has

a cause? If you think that the prime mover argument fails, then why do you think so?

I would love to hear your thoughts and as far as I can tell from watching you on YouTube or in your

website, you haven't touched the subject.

As such, I do not think that this is a subject that is redundant.

So I hope to hear from you as to what merit this argument may have.

Thank you for your time.

I look forward to reading your reply.

Dave in the US.

...