meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Protecting Liberty with State Constitutions

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 14 December 2019

⏱️ 14 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

State constitutions continue to serve as powerful and underappreciated protectors against overweening government. Rick Esenberg of the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty comments.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This holiday season, please consider supporting the Cato Institute and specifically the Cato Daily Podcast,

0:06.1

visit Cato.org slash podcast sponsor to get started.

0:10.0

If you support Cato with a donation of a thousand dollars or more, I'll gladly give you a shout out on the podcast,

0:15.6

or you can designate another individual to receive that benefit,

0:19.2

and all the other benefits of being a Cato sponsor. That website again is Cato.org

0:23.7

slash podcast sponsor and thank you for your generosity. This is the Cato Daily

0:30.1

podcast for Saturday, December 14, 2019.

0:33.8

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:35.0

State constitutions protect liberty.

0:37.3

That's no surprise.

0:38.9

But it's important for state judges

0:40.8

to know that the US Constitution needn't be consulted if the Liberty

0:45.0

interest is protected by a State Constitution.

0:48.9

Rick Essenberg is president and founder of the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty.

0:54.0

We spoke in October in Colorado Springs about the wise and house of protecting

0:58.1

liberty at the state level.

1:00.9

I will get some of the details wrong here but my friend and former colleague Anthony

1:06.1

Kamegna at the Cato Institute sort of educated me about Abram D. Smith who wrote

1:10.8

an important opinion in a case, declaring that a man who had been liberated from slavery

1:20.9

and ended up in Wisconsin was in fact a resident of Wisconsin and was do all of the rights that

1:30.0

people in Wisconsin are do.

1:32.0

And the US Supreme Court overturned that case,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.