This is John Batcher, conversation with my good friend

Gregory Coppley, editor and publisher of Defense and Foreign Affairs,

of the ambition of Sir Care Starmer, the Prime Minister of the

overwhelming labor majority in the UK government.

To end hereditary peers sitting in the House of Lords,

so that Lords becomes a political animal.

Why? Gregory explains.

And what does this mean for the realm?

Gregory explains.

And what else does it mean that Sir Karest Armour

is opposed to that is traditional?

It has always been with the United Kingdom.

What else does Kirst armor recommend following in the footsteps of labor governments.

Gregory Coppley, the end of hereditary peers in the House of Lords, something you didn't know you knew about or

care about, but this was us once upon a time when America was the colonies and

but for a few unhappy conversations would be a member of the

Commonwealth. Gregory Coppley, more of this tonight.

Well it's just part of his agenda which was revealed in the King's speech from the throne at the

opening of this parliamentary session where he outlined his programme but it's follows particularly the government of Tony Blair who was also a labor party

Ninety seven to 2007 where they declared war on the House of Lords, they want to remove the

possibility of a House of Review of Legislation, so that they can dominate

the House of Commons and pass legislation and then it goes

...