Here's how high review sees itself in the long run of human history because believe it or not, these criticisms that were advancing have been advanced in the past.

And so they have a long blog post that starts out with a paragraph entitled,

From Natural Selection to Job Selection.

Wow. Wow's.

Who's writing that book? We love it, folks. We absolutely love it. Who's writing...

We love it, folks.

We absolutely love it.

Who's writing the ad copy?

Who's doing this?

Someone who did really well on the test, clearly.

Someone who has a lot of success genes.

So, you know,

success is a recessive allele.

It doesn't always pop up in the punnet square.

Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace's discovery in the natural world snowballed into other disciplines, psychology included.

And it was never used to justify anything bad.

If nature could select the best traits,

why couldn't we do the same?

Why couldn't psychologists do the same for employers?

Why can't we do frenologies too?

Now, I think again,

they may have anticipated this criticism, but they're also, like most

...