if you accept that climate change is real and that basically our entire society is based on cheap

energy, we need to find a way to provide that cheap energy. The technology, so you're talking to an

engineer, the technology is absolutely there. So we could easily power the entire US using just

existing technology, photovoltaic, solar, biomass, wind.

The only question is economics.

So can we do it cheaper or for a price that the society is willing to pay for it?

So any technology that can make renewable energy cheaper and getting it more competitive with basically paid off nuclear power or paid off coal or highly sub-fetched oil and gas. So, yes, so basically airborne wind is not trying to compete with other renewables, right?

Other renewables are there and are being built a lot around the world.

So if you look on how fast solar has been growing over the last years, how fast wind has been growing,

conventional wind turbines have been growing, offshore wind has been growing.

So a lot of people and a lot of engineering is done of getting the existing renewable energy

sources on speed, but trying to find additional sources that could potentially be even cheaper or generate power

in places and at times that the existing ones can. I mean, you got the old, well, okay,

what do you do if at night, if the sun doesn't shine, does my TV turn off? Or what do I do

if there's no winter on my house? Right. So the more diverse we are in terms of power generation, the more stable the network becomes

and the less we have to worry about storage.

All right.

So you always have a combination of different sources of energy generating power.

So it's not constant.

Basically, if you do nuclear coal, a gas and so on, they all feed the power into the grid.

And then you have a consumption on the other side that is not constant either.

So if everybody turns on TB at night or the consumption goes up, all the factory start in the morning.

...