PREVIEW: ATOMS FOR PEACE: EISENHOWER: NON-PROLIFERATION: Conversation with colleague Henry Sokolski of the NPEC regarding the theme in the Cold War that the Atoms for Peace program turned gloomy with a drive to build vast atomic bomb arsenals. More tonigh
The John Batchelor Show
John Batchelor
4.5 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 16 August 2024
⏱️ 3 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
1953
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:16.4 | This is John Bachelor, conversation with my colleague Henry Sikalsky, the Executive Director of Non-proliferation Policy Education Center, about the moment in the Cold War when the utopian theories of the atomic bomb, the atomic weapons, atoms for war and atoms for peace, the moment that that turned into war, war, war thinking all the time. |
| 0:26.0 | The depths of the Cold War, the mutually assured destruction policy, the counter-force and |
| 0:31.7 | counter-value theories. |
| 0:34.0 | All of that happened as Henry describes it. |
| 0:38.0 | It was also the author of the Non-proliferation Treaty that |
| 0:42.0 | is part of the conversation here in the 21st century. |
| 0:47.0 | When Adams for Peace turned into War War, and has been ever since right now the reawakening of the nuclear arsenal for the |
| 0:57.4 | United States and Russia, the building of the nuclear arsenal for the People's |
| 1:01.7 | Republic of China and elsewhere. |
| 1:03.8 | Henry Sikowski, more of this tonight. |
| 1:06.3 | Yeah, I think there is actually. |
| 1:08.3 | There was a guy named Ambassador James Wonsworth who was really a man who was a civil servant. |
| 1:17.3 | He read the literature of academics and came to the conclusion that the basis of the |
| 1:26.0 | Adam's Peace program which was well we need to divert production in Russia so they don't have enough nuclear material to get, I don't know, |
| 1:37.4 | several hundred or a thousand bombs that would wipe out a hundred American cities. |
| 1:41.9 | Was a very mistaken way to look at the nuclear threat. |
| 1:45.0 | And he said, you know, just one weapon diverted from any of these plants or that goes off in an accident would be a disaster. You don't need to imagine that you |
| 1:57.6 | need a hundred, several hundred or several thousand before you get a strategic result. |
| 2:07.0 | That was in around 1956 and it helped propel thinking the effort to negotiate what eventually came in the nuclear |
| 2:12.4 | nonproliferation treaty that was finalized in 68. |
| 2:17.1 | I'd say that was the beginning of at least some recognition that there's a problem here that if you divert even one |
| 2:26.7 | bombs worth from any facility, military, civil, and it's fired in anger, you could be in tremendous, tremendous trouble. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Batchelor, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of John Batchelor and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

