most of the other lawsuits that were about this are saying, hey, you're using our material

to generate your various outputs. But in order to get the, in order to actually secure a judgment,

you have to see, not just that the input, that not just that my stuff was used to train your

thing to create its outputs, but that your outputs are substantially similar as well.

And that's what this lawsuit is doing.

And, you know, this is, there are, the UK is actually trying to, um,

jump the government in front of this process because again, UK politics is only able to

pull the government into the path of this process.

Um, yes. I think the British government should jump in front of a train, to be honest.

I think that would probably be like the kindest thing to do for itself.

I welcome the train, but I encourage it to go faster.

Ministers are proposing to update copyright laws to exempt text and data mining in an attempt to attract

AI developers, but dropped plans after a backlash of artists.

Yeah, I mean, this would make it so easy just to destroy intellectual property law

for better and worse.

Like the thinnest veil of algorithm over like, I could create something I say as

an artificial intelligence, like, call it like the content stealer 3000, right?

And it just like, entirely like copies, paste, changes two words around.

That would then be legal for me to do anything with.

Incredible. Incredible.

Yeah.

Well, you're just now putting out your own version of the catcher in the ride, but everyone's speaking like yoga.

...