Pink Floyd the wall, or is it Pink Floyd's the wall? I never know where they put the S there.

And of course, he's run up against a lot of copyright issues over the years, a lot of debate on what constitutes fair use.

You know me, I think probably all that stuff should be fair use, although all that stuff should be in the public domain.

But if it's not, then I think he pretty flagrantly violated copyright on all this

stuff. I mean, the stuff is obviously a substitute for the viewing experience. Well, I am definitely a

fair use guy myself. I'm an open the patents guy. Except in this case. I think in this case,

I would make an exception. I hope every filmmaker who, you know, his work he ever talked

about, you know, every, every band whose music he copied, I hope they sue this motherfucker

into the ground. This was, without a doubt, the worst thing, just on the level of like the physical

agony this caused me to sit through whatever 35 minutes or whatever this this was well we should

say this is the nostalgia critics review of pink floyd the wall the 1982 film this is the

worst thing we've ever watched i think it might be the worst piece of content ever created ever created

wow i think that we need to issue letters of mark for this guy i want

you know every privateer in the world to be hunting him from this day forward i am declaring on

behalf of the michaelanus podcast we are declaring a holy war so instead of in the flesh the opening

track from the wall you get a song that's called

Very Innovative, the way he riffs on the titles, In The Floyd, the refrain, you know,

which will be melodically familiar.

If you know the album or the film is, if you want to find out what's behind this weird

shit, you'll first have to figure out if it's lame or legit.

And that's about as far as the sort of parody goes.

You got, you know, the songs are called like, when the wall broke free.

...