This is the Friends of History Debating Society. I'm John Bachelor. I welcome my colleague and friend,

that is McCotter, writing an American greatness, recovering politician, admiring the Democratic

National Conventions' peculiar glossary, we saw the word joy again

and again. You might not have seen immediately the explanation was published in the New York Times and other places as to why it is

that the press has not had more policy detail from the Harris-Waltz campaign. The explanation was a new term to me and that is has

now written it up for all of us to understand. The term is strategic vagueness.

That is a very good evening to you.

The first time I ran across this I did a double take because I wasn't sure it was a quote.

But then again, the New York Times doesn't make fun of its side. It very carefully

reproduces what is said. Your column is about strategic vagueness. How does this follow from the presentation of the Harris

campaign? Good evening to you. Good evening to you, John. Well I call up the new

switcher-ruh. The first switcher-ru was when Mr. Biden was jettisoned by the Democratic Party and

they are hand-picked candidate of the party elite, Vice President Kamala Harris, was put in his place.

That was the first switcher group, obviously. The declining poll numbers of

Mr. Biden was causing consternation amongst the Democratic power

brokers as well as the party faithful and they had to get with Mr. Biden as their nominee.

In choosing Ms Harris, they had a problem.

You could saddle up President Biden,

put all the policy failures economically, domestically

for him affairs and otherwise onto his shoulders

and send him off into an invisible exile

with plenty of ice cream for him to lick his wounds.

...