It's good to be here, John, and I'm so excited to hear the thoughts from Colonel Phil Waldron

about this unrestricted, unconventional warfare that's unfolding right now, because that's really

the theme for my segment today, only I'm giving it a little bit of a different name.

I'm calling it plausible deniability warfare.

And this is a phrase that I'm coining today. And I think it's going to

start to make sense as I start to illustrate this kind of technique that both the good guys and the

bad guys are using right now. And we refer to these ambiguous groups like the deep state and the

white hats because there are just so many different

actors on the world stage.

There are state actors, there are intelligence agencies, there's institutions like the media,

and they're all at war with each other, and they're all coordinating with each other.

So it's an interesting and historic time to be alive.

It's not the warfare from World War II.

It's a different game now.

Oh, without question. Well, said. Well, let's get into this plausible deniability and start

connecting the dots for us. Sounds very interesting. Sure. Yeah, you know, the definition of

plausible deniability is just the ability to deny that you're involved in an activity because there's no clear evidence to prove that you're involved.

And so, of course, we all know that there's secretive and covert warfare going on around the world, but it's not always with people with uniforms.

And I'm going to suggest to the audience today that many of the news events, the people

just gloss over and they just think that it's nothing, is actually an operation.

It's a plausibly-deniable covert operation.

And so a good example of this as far as psychological operation would be Q&ON.

...