Sean Morgan.

It's great to be here, John.

Thanks for the intro.

And yesterday I got started talking about this whole concept of plausible deniability warfare,

which is a form of covert warfare that is becoming just the way warfare is nowadays.

You know, it's just not the way it was back in World War II and

everybody wore uniforms and they were dropping bombs and you knew who was the enemy and they were

identifying themselves easily. Now it's a whole other game. And when you look at these headlines,

there are a whole lot of coincidental accidents. And people just sweep them under the rug, but researchers try to figure it all out.

So I wanted to get into some real breaking news that happened yesterday, but just to give a little bit more context here of what plausible deniability means.

It just means that you can deny no really clear evidence

to prove you were involved. And so, a good example, let's just pull up the earthquakes just so

happen to be destroying Iranian nuclear facilities. This is a headline from last year,

but this is not the only time it's happened.

This is for regular nuclear facilities, but there are a whole bunch of underground nuclear

facilities that were supposed to be secret that underground earthquakes destroyed in the past

year or so. So there's been this underground, literally underground war

going on. And the funny thing about the subtitle to that headline is that it says the tandem

earthquakes struck just two hours after the country launched missiles at two US military bases.

So the context is just like a regular war where there's retaliation,

and yet the retaliation happens to be something that was under the cover of a natural disaster.

And I also want to bring attention, let's look at on the screen how we've been having these

...