meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Michael and Us

Patreon Bonus Preview: The Terrifying Future of the American Right (w/ Matt Sitman & Sam Adler-Bell)

Michael and Us

Luke Savage and Will Sloan

Society & Culture

4.5697 Ratings

🗓️ 22 December 2021

⏱️ 7 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

PATREON BONUS - https://www.patreon.com/posts/60215138 What exactly is “national conservatism” and to what extent does it represent a break from the post-Reaganite consensus as we’ve known it? Luke talked to Matthew Sitman and Sam Adler-Bell (cohosts of the Know Your Enemy podcast) about the recent National Conservative Conference (NatCon), the so-called national conservatives, and where the Right may be headed in the coming years.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I guess a good place to begin might be just very basically with the phrase national conservatism.

0:07.7

This was a term associated with the inaugural version of the conference, which just happened.

0:13.2

And before we get into a deeper discussion of anything here, I think it might be worth laying out a bit exactly what that refers to. So for a moment, putting

0:22.9

aside the question of what the two of you think national conservatism actually is, how might

0:29.0

the median speaker or attendee at one of these conferences characterize it? What would the elevator

0:35.9

pitch be from a partisan of the new right?

0:39.2

I think one, if you're talking about the participants, meaning, you know, people who are pretty

0:44.1

engaged and probably are following the debates, and they would probably say something like

0:49.0

national conservatism, at least what it isn't, is the same old fusionism, Reaganite conservatism, you know,

0:57.7

free markets, traditional values, and even, you know, there's a critique of foreign policy,

1:02.6

though, a more, you know, a critique of a more neo-conish, aggressive internationalist foreign policy, too.

1:09.5

So they would define it in one sense, I think,

1:11.5

against what had been the prevailing consensus among conservative intellectuals about what

1:16.7

conservatism was. And it's meant to distinguish itself from that. And you can see like four

1:21.6

runners of that in like Sohra Bar Mari's piece against David Frenchism. That kind of against

1:27.0

something I think,

1:28.6

is an important, they're saying this thing has failed and they're trying to chart a different path.

1:33.3

And what it means positively, I think, is still being worked out. But, you know, it's, it's, I would say

1:39.3

in some ways, an intellectual version of Trumpism, which is, you know, untrade, foreign policy, immigration,

1:47.6

so on and so forth. They're hitting like Trumpy themes, even if they don't express themselves

1:52.4

the same way or whatever, but they're kind of entering, you're kind of feeling that populous

1:56.6

space cleared by Trump when he burst through the primaries in 2016. That's right. I would add to it that

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Luke Savage and Will Sloan, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Luke Savage and Will Sloan and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.