There's got to be a seizure of these criminal monies.

The money laundering that was created in the Southern District of New York.

It was created. The scheme was created. in the Southern District of New York.

It was created, the scheme was created

in the Federal Prison in the Southern District of New York

with residents of the Southern District of New York.

So there's no question about venue and jurisdiction.

Of course, the investments were even managed by the lawyers in the Southern District of New York.

Something leaves.

Well let me ask you your opinion why it hasn't been done. What could be at play based on your

experience and your knowledge what could be at play why it's not being done?

And does it relate to a double-sided question here,

two-tier question, does it relate to the removal of Berman?

Would it have been more a chance, let me rephrase, would the chances of a seizure

been better if Berman stayed in place as opposed to him being removed and is that part of the reason he was removed?

You get my drift.

The second prong of your point of removing and firing the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York

versus seizing the money rolling it over a billion dollars now is on the table.

It's on the table.

What you're fine-tuning, Michael, is to help focus the media as to Mr Berman is firing and the seizure of the over billion dollars of criminal process.

They go all on the table and they have to be done.

It's a scandal, Michael, a very serious American scandal.

...