It's not complicated. We see it happening before our eyes. We have the evidence of the past to make that projection into our case.

And based on that evidence, the questions beg, do we have a rule of law?

Will that rule of law be upheld?

Or are we subject to the whims, the dictates, the mandate of this elitist class, and or are they also subject to the rule of law. We have laid out specific

claims in our case. Ours is a civil tax claim, okay?

We laid out and we highlighted in the congressional hearing that the Clinton

Foundation was acting as a foreign agent, okay? It was operating outside of its approved authority.

Okay, they were making material misrepresentations in their reports,

all saw, many of which was in their

report, all, many of which was signed under penalty of perjury,

but also that the private foundations,

okay, and none more than the Clinton Foundation's second largest donor.

That is the Gates Foundation are themselves subject to tax

based on donations that they made to the Clinton Foundation.

And others, and others.

In many others.

There's a multiplier.

I mean you recognize the Pritzker name out of Illinois, yes subject.

So you have all of that.

Ours is a civil tax claim.

If somebody wanted to make a criminal case, that's not for us?

Clearly we could support it based on our evidence, but ours is a civil tax claim.

...