OA502: Why Critical Race Theory is Indispensable
Opening Arguments
Opening Arguments Media LLC
4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 25 June 2021
⏱️ 74 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
This is a continuation of Episode 501's exploration of a rather arcane bit of legal jurisprudence that has somehow become the target du jour of the right wing, from Matt Gaetz to Newsmax to... well, Matt Gaetz again. That's right, it's an explanation of what critical race theory actually is, and whether it should be banned. (Hint: no)
In this episode, you'll learn more about the definitely NOT Marxist postmodern critique of language and legal textbooks, including an in-depth discussion of a case you probably have never heard of -- Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. 543 (1823). And if you have heard of the case, then a) you're probably a lawyer or law student, and b) you should thank a critical legal studies theorist!
We'll also get in depth with two of the founders of the CRT movement, Mari Matsuda and Kimberle Crenshaw. Learn what their unique contributions to legal scholarship were and are, and decide for yourself whether this is too dangerous for grad students to even read.
Finally, we'll delve back into the one-man astroturf unit that is Christopher F. Rufo and learn how he's deliberately misleading everyone about what CRT is in order to stoke a moral panic. This is an episode you don't want to miss & might want to share even with your Uncle Frank!
Finally, we do an Andrew Was Wrong on Arrow's Theorem as math professors rise up and storm our studio.
Links
- We first discussed CRT in Episode 501; go check that out if you haven't yet.
- Andrew definitively stated that he was not a CRT theorist & believed there are right answers in the law in Episode 477 critiquing originalism.
- Florida's latest law is HB 233 on "intellectual freedom and viewpoint diversity," which kind of contradicts the whole banning CRT thing.
- Check out Richard Delgado & Jean Stefancic's "Rodrigo's Reappraisal" (2021).
- You can read Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. 543 (1823) for yourself.
- The Rufo timeline we mentioned was published in the Wall Street Journal, and you can check out the text of Trump's executive order here. You can also read his garbage article in the NY Post... you know what? I'm not going to link that. He's terrible.
- You should definitely read Mari Matsuda's Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story (1989) and Kimberle Crenshaw's Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color from the 1991 Stanford Law Review.
- Finally, I would also recommend reading Aya Gruber's "Against Carceral Feminism" (2021).
Appearances
None! Have us on!
-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
–Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos!
-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!
-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | The party in the face part should be known in this contract as the party in the face part. |
| 0:19.2 | The witness will comply under the, uh, this, uh, zero. |
| 0:27.8 | Judge Perth is stumped by this case. |
| 0:29.7 | I've also misplaced my judge-hammin. |
| 0:31.7 | The Justice system works swiftly in the future and I'll think of polished all lawyers. |
| 0:39.7 | The light cloud will suggest that your client drives my client back to your client's flat where |
| 0:48.7 | your client will play some James Taylor. |
| 0:53.7 | Welcome to Opening Arguments, a podcast that pairs a comedian with a real-life lawyer. |
| 0:59.7 | This podcast is sponsored by the law offices of P Andrew Torres LLC for entertainment purposes, |
| 1:04.7 | is not intended as legal advice and does not form an attorney-client relationship. |
| 1:08.7 | Don't take legal advice from a podcast. |
| 1:17.7 | Hello and welcome to Opening Arguments. This is episode 502. I'm Thomas. That's Andrew. How you doing, sir? |
| 1:23.7 | I am fantastic. Thomas, how are you? |
| 1:25.7 | I'm doing fantastic because I loved 501 so much. It was one of those ones that was a joy to edit, |
| 1:31.7 | like just going through it the second time. You did such a good job there, Andrew. |
| 1:35.7 | And guess what, everybody? I think Andrew has a little announcement about our content that we're |
| 1:40.7 | deciding to do these next few episodes. |
| 1:42.7 | CRT is in the news right now. We wanted to do these episodes back to back so that if you're out there |
| 1:49.7 | sharing maybe even sharing these episodes with an Uncle Frank in your life, |
| 1:55.7 | you can point that person to two episodes back to back, two plus hours on critical race theory. |
| 2:03.7 | And just was an introduction to that. Yes, so Uncle Frank, if you're listening, |
| 2:09.7 | yes, this is a liberal show. But nothing we're going to tell you about critical race theory |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.