OA396.5 BONUS Episode: Will You Be Able To Read John Bolton's Book?
Opening Arguments
Opening Arguments Media LLC
4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 20 June 2020
⏱️ 65 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Today's bonus episode takes a deep dive into the lawsuit brought by the Trump Administration to try and block the publication of John Bolton's tell-all book. We break down the legal arguments and tell you whether you can look forward to getting that copy you ordered or not. (And seriously, you shouldn't give money to John Bolton. He's still a scumbag.)
We begin, however, with a quick Andrew Was Right! in that PG&E pleaded guilty to 84 counts of manslaughter; we told you PG&E was likely criminally liable way back in Episode 241!
Then, it's time to break down the Justice in Policing Act of 2020 which just passed the House Judiciary Committee and is an unambiguously good bill. Listen and find out why!
After that, it's time to dig in to both the Complaint and the motion for TRO filed by the United States on behalf of Donald Trump because John Bolton's book made Trump feel bad. Do we really live in a society in which that happened? Yes. Do we live in one in which the court will grant injunctive relief? No. Listen and find out why.
No #T3BE in this bonus episode but there's lots and lots of great content!
Patreon Bonuses
All patrons get a special behind-the-scenes deep dive into our amicus brief!
Appearances
None! But if you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, event, or in front of your group (virtually!), please drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.
Show Notes & Links
- Although the plea agreement isn't available, this Ars Technica article is a good timeline of PG&E's criminal activities; we told you PG&E was likely criminally liable way back in Episode 241!
- Click here to read the Justice in Policing Act of 2020 which just passed the House Judiciary Committee.
- You can read the Supreme Court's decision in Snepp v. U.S. 444 U.S. 507 (1980), the decision in the Pentagon Papers case, and also read the Complaint and the motion for TRO filed by the U.S. against Bolton. Injunctive relief is governed by Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
- Finally, check out the NSA's pre-publication procedures.
-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!
-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-Remember to check out our YouTube Channel for Opening Arguments: The Briefs and other specials!
-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Ready to take your crypto trading to the next level? |
| 0:03.4 | Look no further than Crack and Pro, the ultimate platform for traders. |
| 0:07.1 | Crack and Pro gives you access to advanced charting tools, |
| 0:10.2 | real-time market data, and lightning fast trade execution. |
| 0:13.7 | Plus with an intuitive interface and customizable layout, |
| 0:16.8 | you can tailor your trading experience to suit your needs. |
| 0:19.6 | Join millions of traders who trust Crack and Pro for their crypto trading needs. |
| 0:23.8 | Visit pro.crack and dot com to get started today, |
| 0:26.5 | not investment advice, crypto trading involves risk of loss. |
| 0:30.0 | He's not even a lawyer and he's kicking your ass. |
| 0:48.8 | No! Bad lawyer! I need a loophole! |
| 0:53.0 | He's not just a student executioner! He is! |
| 1:00.4 | I'm sorry, but my mother always said if you can't say anything nice, |
| 1:07.6 | don't say anything at all. Will that hold up in court? |
| 1:10.6 | No, I've tried it before. |
| 1:16.2 | Stop. Ask a question, a lawyer would ask please. |
| 1:20.3 | I am a lawyer. |
| 1:23.2 | Welcome to opening arguments, the podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real-life |
| 1:29.5 | lawyer. This podcast is sponsored by the law offices of P.A. |
| 1:32.8 | Antitoura's LLC for entertainment purposes is not intended as legal advice and does not form |
| 1:37.8 | an attorney-client relationship. Don't take legal advice from a podcast. |
| 1:48.5 | Hello and welcome to opening arguments as I always say. Don't adjust that dial! |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

