meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Counsel

Note from Rachel 9/11: Prudence over Politics

The Counsel

Some Spider, Inc.

Politics, News

4.6848 Ratings

🗓️ 11 September 2024

⏱️ 8 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Rachel Barkow is the Charles Seligson Professor of Law at NYU School of Law and the Faculty Director of the Zimroth Center on the Administration of Criminal Law at NYU. From 2013 to 2019, she served as a Member of the United States Sentencing Commission. From 2010 to 2020, she was a member of the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office Conviction Integrity Policy Advisory Panel and co-chaired Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s transition committee on police accountability in 2021. She is also amongst the most cited legal scholars of all time.  For a transcript of Rachel’s note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

With an Intel AI PC, AI assistance helps you save time.

0:06.0

With AI-powered text-to-image tools, you can unleash your creativity with fewer clicks,

0:12.0

or let AI draft your emails.

0:16.0

It's possible on an Intel AI PC.

0:20.0

Additional purchase may be required.

0:22.3

Learn more at intel.co.uk slash AIPC.

0:32.0

Hey folks, Rachel here.

0:34.1

Here's a recording of my latest cafe note,

0:36.3

Prudence over politics. As always, please

0:38.8

write to us with your thoughts and questions at Letters atcafe.com.

0:48.0

Dear listener, those of you following the criminal case against Donald Trump and Manhattan

0:52.7

for falsifying business records

0:54.8

may have had September 18th circled on your calendar as the date to watch. That was originally

1:00.8

the date on which Trump was to be sentenced. On Friday, September 6th, however, Judge Juan

1:06.6

Mershawn granted Trump's request to adjourn the sentencing until after the 2024 presidential

1:12.1

election. The DA's office all but supported a postponement, outlining for the court many

1:17.5

reasons in favor of an adjournment. Faced with what seemed to be an agreement by the parties to

1:22.8

hold off on the sentencing, it should therefore not have been surprising that Judge Mershahn rescheduled the

1:28.4

sentencing for November 26th. Sentencing adjournments happen routinely, particularly when the parties agree.

1:35.3

Some, however, have been critical of delaying sentencing. Norman Eisen, for example, wrote on

1:40.7

August 20th before Judge Mershant's decision that there is no reason here to divert from prompt

1:46.9

an orderly administration of justice and pointed out that no other defendant would have been

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Some Spider, Inc., and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Some Spider, Inc. and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.