I.D. The Future, a podcast about evolution and intelligent design.

Science is a very human enterprise, and very human problems can color scientific research,

as well as the narratives cast around evidence and findings.

So how do we separate fact from hype?

Welcome to I do the Future. I'm your host, Andrew McDermott.

Today, we're sharing the first half of a conversation with Dr. Casey Luskin

that originally aired on the Cum Laudas Reason Together podcast, hosted by Lenny Esposito.

Casey discusses the growing controversy surrounding Sahelanthropus Cedensis,

a fossil often described as one of the earliest human ancestors.

But what began as a celebrated evolutionary discovery has now sparked open disagreement among evolutionary scientists

themselves. In this segment, Casey reviews the history of paleoanthropology, what the field

is trying to prove about human origins, and how language, bias, politics, prestige, and funding

pressure all play a part in how discoveries are framed and evidence

is weighed. Now, here's Casey Luskin and his host, Lenny Esposito.

Good day, everyone. Welcome again to come Let Us reason together. I'm Lenny Esposito, and as I said,

we are going to be exploring the interesting and sometimes

controversial aspects of doing anthropology, paleoanthropology as it is, where we're trying

to understand where we came from and what the fossil evidence actually shows.

Now, in order to help me with this, I've asked

Dr. Casey Luskin to join in. Casey is a senior fellow for the Center of Science and Culture at

the Discovery Institute, and he's written a couple of really interesting articles on this new discovery

and the blowback that's happened within even

...